Two reasons 1 google dislikes privacy 2 technically it looks spammy On January 26, 2021 6:58:36 p.m. EST, Kevin Szabo <k [ dot ] s [ dot ] szabo [ at ] gmail [ dot ] com> wrote: >I just found one of the replies to this thread was marked as spam. >Dunno >why > >[image: image.png] > > >On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:54 AM James Lockie <bjlockie [ at ] lockie [ dot ] ca> >wrote: > >> $799 USD for the base phoe >> No wireless AC. :-( >> >> On January 23, 2021 00:06:57 "Brenda J. Butler" <bjb [ at ] sourcerer [ dot ] ca> >wrote: >> >> Hello Linux hive-mind - >>>> >>>> Anyone out there in Linux-land with experience they are willing to >share >>>> using a cell phone with good privacy that doesn't track you? >>>> >>> >>> This request eventually reminded me about the Purism phone: >>> >>> https://puri.sm/ >>> >>> which purports to be a ground-up phone OS designed for privacy. >>> >>> I have not bought it but maybe I should. >>> >>> I was under the impression that the person who started the >>> company was in Toronto but they are based in the States now. >>> But that is a vague memory and may be entirely false. >>> >>> They don't have social media icons. Their web page (front page) >>> is served from one server (impressive!). They have a warrant >>> canary page and two people gpg-sign a message for that page on >>> a monthly basis. >>> >>> Looks legit. >>> >>> I'm guessing they are expensive as they are not subsidized >>> by Big Tech. Haven't seen prices yet. >>> >>> bjb >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a blank message to >linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org >>> To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org >>> To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org >>> >> >> -- Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com