home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

RE: [OCLUG-Tech] Anybody used DB2 for Linux? AccPac for Linux?

In the DB world, MySQL and PostGres are still behind the major vendors
in terms of functionality. MySQL is slowly catching up but things like
stored procedures are very new. I can understand why some large db
applications are not supporting currently MySQL. The most complete open
source DBs are Firebird and MySQL's MaxDB. 

And no matter what DB you have, if this app is transactional (I guess
quite likely) then setting up backup plans and even installing the
storage is not straightforward (eg. setting up the transaction log and
db store and enabling incremental backups for instance).

I'm also not sure what load/number of connections you have to handle but
IBM has a free DB2 version (limited to 2 processors I believe). Same for
Oracle and M$.

Erik.


-----Original Message-----
From: linux-bounces [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca
[mailto:linux-bounces [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca] On Behalf Of Bill Strosberg
Sent: July 13, 2006 15:26
To: linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca
Subject: Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Anybody used DB2 for Linux? AccPac for Linux?


Putrycz, Erik wrote:
> In my little experience:
> - Oracle is a hell of configuration... but you can make it do exactly
> what you want... I believe it is the most powerful DB (clustering, SQL
> options, etc.)
> - DB2 has more self-tuning built-in I believe and could make it easier
> to manage. 
> But each of these DBs is a whole universe. If you are going to support
> that system, I would go for the DB I'm the most familiar with. Nothing
> is straightforward with a DB when things start to get complex...
Setting
> up a backup plan, performance tuning, etc... Each of these tasks
> requires a good knowledge.
>
> IBM and Oracle have a strong Linux support, I wouldn't expect many 
> issues with them, but you may want to go for an official supported 
> Linux distribution (SLES or RHES). All their testing seems to be done 
> on these platforms.
>   
I very much appreciate the responses (both on and off-line)!

This client is a small private operation with very minimal requirements
other than stability and reliability.

To be frank, I do not want to have to enter a new dimension/universe, I
just want this particular application to run reliably!  I do not intend
to use the Sage AccPac backend RDB for anything other than this
application.

Pervasive just got back to me - $845USD for a six user license on Linux
for a flat file btrieve database that has an SQL frontend.  They will
also sell me PostgreSQL support, but they have not made their P-SQL
API's work on PostgreSQL, so there is no Sage AccPac option. 

Any other DB requirements for this client will be handled in either
PostgreSQL or MySQL.  If I had my druthers, Sage AccPac would support
one of the two former databases, as my familiarity lies therein.

I wish that vendors like Sage would understand that adding support for
open source database products would dramatically increase appeal for
their offerings as well as cost less.  For the real-world smb operator,
a full fledged enterprise class commercial database is pointless
overkill.

Please ... keep the feedback coming!  This is helping a lot.  If I
decide to proceed with this I'll document the process for posterity and
the benefit of others.

--
Bill Strosberg
_______________________________________________
Linux mailing list
Linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca http://www.oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux