On 3 Jun 2005 at 10:30, Rod Giffin wrote: > On Fri, June 3, 2005 10:25, Dan Langille said: > > On 3 Jun 2005 at 10:20, Bill Strosberg wrote: > >> CACert is no better or worse than anyone else in the business. My > >> position is that the whole on-line trust model is broken. > >> Profit!-motivated organizations have no place in a trustworthy > >> system. Principles are always soluable in cash. > > > > CACert is not a company. It's not involved in cash. There's no > > profit. I don't see how your comments relate to my question. > > According to their website, CACert is indeed a company > (not-for-profit, asking for donations). They identify themselves as > CACert Inc. http://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=13 So you are equating that company, which I didn't notice before, with the CACert community and project? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/