On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> The question is: what do you mean by "serious" production work? Qt
> is proven technology that has been pretty much everywhere. Adobe
> uses Qt. Skype uses Qt. Many embedded systems do use Qt. QNX has
> outdated their Neutrino toolkit in favor of Qt. KDE has been using
> Qt for ages.
>
> I would say that the most immediate advantage is, like every other
> framework, it will save a bunch of hardwork.
>
> I think drawbacks can be relative. I can't think of anything right
> now, but since Qt targets a very very broad and wide audience, I
> think it really depends on what you're working with. It's very hard
> to judge from a general standpoint imho.
it was, admittedly, a broad and nebulous question. i was just
wondering if there were any obvious drawbacks in incorporating Qt into
enterprise-wide coding projects. i don't see any off-hand, but
someone who's been working with it would obviously know better.
so far, while working through the review, i'm reasonably impressed
with the features.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================