home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Linux Digest, Vol 69, Issue 16

>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:32:58 -0400
> From: OddSox <oddsoxster [ at ] gmail [ dot ] com>
> Subject: Re: [OCLUG-Tech] Questions about a Linux file server I am
>        about to        build.
> To: OCLUG Technical <linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca>
> Message-ID: <B6D870B7-B221-4420-A74B-CD155CDC4EAA [ at ] gmail [ dot ] com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Charles Nadeau wrote:
>
> > ? How much RAM should I get for a file server like the one I am building?
> > Will more RAM means more cache and better performance or with a small
> number
> > of clients it doesn?t really matter? Is ECC-RAM really important in my
> > situation?
>
> In terms of file-serving, the drives will likely be the bottleneck -
> especially running RAID 5. Your router/switch/network may very well


I know but I think the transfer rate of 6 RAIDed "green" drives will still
be higher than the one of one fast drive. On my current machine, I get
275MB/sec from my RAID 5 array of 6 drives.
Network-wise I am using a pair of bonded gigabit NIC per workstation so I am
pretty good on this side.

Thanks!

Charles


> be the next bottleneck before RAM. With only 3 users any additional memory
> probably won't even be noticed (most of the time anyway - lots of small
> files and/or really big files can make a difference) but it sure won't hurt.
>
> Buy as much RAM as you can afford, keeping in mind that it almost certainly
> will be cheaper next year.
> --
> Charles Nadeau Ph.D.
> http://charlesnadeau.blogspot.com/
>