home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] 64-BIT Ubuntu


On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:37:22AM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * Messier, Jean-Francois <jmessier [ at ] justice [ dot ] gc [ dot ] ca> [070419 09:33]:
> > I'm currently getting Ubuntu 7.04, and my laptop is supposed to be
> > 64-bit-capable. This is a Centrino 2 Duo. It has two of this 5200
> > processors, at 1.6 GHz. There is a 64-bit version of the latest Ubuntu,
> > but it is marked as for AMD64. 
> 
> Intel cloned the amd64 (aka x86-64) platform.  If you have a Intel
> processor in a laptop that's capable of 64bit -- it's not Itanium --
> then it will run amd64 distributions.

heh.  ia64 (Itanium) in a laptop would just silly.  Luckily, it doesn't
exist.  You can't buy ia64 mistakenly.  It just won't happen.

I don't think anyone even sells ia64 workstations anymore.  HP did at
one point but they were cancelled a few years ago.

> 
> Ubuntu only has two processor flavours for x86 line: i586 and amd64.
> 
> > Is this something that can run on Intel, or am I stuck with 32-bit ? 
> 
> So in short.  Yes.

yeah, what a braindead naming scheme.  amd64 is really just x64-64.  The
kernel got the arch/x86_64 name right, so why did debian have to go do
it wrong and confuse everyone?  (including me, I might add....it never
occured to me that the "amd64" distro would run on anything other than
AMD processors)

mh

-- 
Martin Hicks || mort [ at ] bork [ dot ] org || PGP/GnuPG: 0x4C7F2BEE

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

replies

references

message navigation