home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: Follow up on last night's discussion on docker

  • Subject: Re: Follow up on last night's discussion on docker
  • From: Dianne Skoll <dianne [ at ] skoll [ dot ] ca>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 12:17:23 -0400
On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 09:02:01 -0700
Ron via linux <linux [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org> wrote:

> If I wrote and maintain $software, I don't want to field bug reports
> from Hentai69Girls420LOL distro's users because that distro has done
> something weird in their repos.

Counterpoint: I did write and support commercial software for a couple
of decades. We had two officially-supported distros with binaries
(Debian and Red Hat), but because we also made source available, we
said to customers: "If you can make it run on your $UNIX_LIKE system,
we will support our software. But if the problem is due to your OS,
you're on your own."

We had a few customers running on Ubuntu, FreeBSD and even Solaris and
it wasn't all that big a deal.

Second counterpoint: Sometimes you can find bugs in your code that are
exposed on different OSes or CPU architectures.  For example, I had a
very long-standing bug in my Remind software that was only exposed
when it ran on Big-endian PowerPC.  Thanks to Debian, it automatically
gets built and tested on a bunch of architectures:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=remind&suite=sid

So I do see a fair bit of value in trying to make your software actually
portable and supportable on a wide variety of distros.

Regards,

Dianne.

To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org