A couple of years ago I discovered how to make multiple profiles for Firefox and ended up with a "Secured Browser" button on my Linux Mint panel that launches Firefox with NoScript and some other stuff in a fairly strict mode for my banking and related use. I find this works well, and suggested to NCF that maybe this should be documented for their users. The response has been that it would be better to have users use just one browser, and that one set up so it is "safe". I've tried using my secured setting generally -- the nagging makes it an unpleasant experience. But I can understand that with very non-tech users, my use of the term "second browser" raised red flags. My queries here are: 1) am I living in a fool's paradise if I think my "secured browser" is any safer than a general browser. My gut feeling is that I should not mix general browsing with transactions. 2a) could an even better "transaction app" (get rid of the word browser, as one is not browsing) be set up and made easy to use on common platforms or 2b) could a general browser have enhanced security when one goes to nominated sites e.g., bank, credit card, etc. (I worry that clever script hacks could turn off such measures if other windows are open.) 3) Would this make a useful topic for both meeting and online (wiki?) discussion and possibly development under the OCLUG banner? Best, JN