home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] a sign of the apocalypse

  • Subject: Re: [OCLUG-Tech] a sign of the apocalypse
  • From: Rob Echlin <rob [ at ] echlin [ dot ] ca>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Not Linux?
- It's the linux kernel (yes, it's a fork of it, but it is the linux kernel)

- isn't it using the Gnu utilities?
- The drivers are proprietary, but that's true of lots of Linux-based devices. Are they not Linux either?


The interface is different, but then KDE, or Gnome or XFCE, or Unity are all different, and the WRT routers don't have GUI's.

Why do you say it is not Linux?
I'm interested to know what your definition of Linux excludes.


Rob



>________________________________
>From: Bart Trojanowski <bart [ at ] jukie [ dot ] ca>
>To: Paul B <red [ dot ] line [ at ] rogers [ dot ] com>
>Cc: Ottawa Linux Users Group <linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca>
>Sent: Monday, July 4, 2011 11:45:50 AM
>Subject: Re: [OCLUG-Tech] a sign of the apocalypse
>
>On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 15:40, Paul B <red [ dot ] line [ at ] rogers [ dot ] com> wrote:
>> Cute. I like the quote, but isn't Android as open source as OSx (I've heard it said over and over that Apple somehow got away with closing their BSD fork)?
>
>BSD license does not prevent closing of a fork.  This is why we like
>the GPL. :-)
>
>And while the Android platform is open, and OSX is not... I do agree
>that "running on Android" is not "running on Linux"
>
>-Bart
>_______________________________________________
>Linux mailing list
>Linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca
>http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux
>
>
>