I have MAN and gcc on Ubuntu(11.04) But then again it was a (upgrade build) I could see the reasoning why not to include apache and web server stuff. We think it odd but we are developers. Why would any end user require Apache. It a Desktop to them From: "Mike Kenzie" <ba600 [ at ] ncf [ dot ] ca> To: linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 4:18:37 PM Subject: Re: [OCLUG-Tech] what is the "uname" variation that shows a 32-bit install on 64-bit system? On Friday 06 May 2011 14:53:32 Rick wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Bart Trojanowski <bart [ at ] jukie [ dot ] ca> wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:24, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb [ at ] tricolour [ dot ] net> wrote: > >> Not quite what you intended, but how about: > >> file $(which uname) > > > > I often do exactly this with '/bin/ls' to test the OS bitness. > > > > Another alternative is to use gcc -dumpmachine ... which is available on > > all systems that matter :-) > > Yeah, what's with Ubuntu, installing without apache, a compiler or man > pages. > Don't forget the bogus vi -- Collector of vintage computers http://www.ncf.ca/~ba600 _______________________________________________ Linux mailing list Linux [ at ] lists [ dot ] oclug [ dot ] on [ dot ] ca http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux