home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: 4 is a bad private key

A deep dive (link below ): "remediated by Mozilla, Microsoft, Apple, and Chrome for their users through their tools for distributing revocation information such as [OneCRL](https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2015/03/03/revoking-intermediate-certificates-introducing-onecrl/), [CRLite](https://hacks.mozilla.org/2025/08/crlite-fast-private-and-comprehensive-certificate-revocation-checking-in-firefox/) and [CRLSets](https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/crlsets/)."

https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/

Richard Leir
Happy Canoeing and Hiking and Biking!

Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for Android.

-------- Original Message --------
On Saturday, 10/24/26 at 08:08 Rick Leir via linux <linux [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org> wrote:

> The other day I commented on http security but I was too oblique. Specifically, there's an issue with the Indian registrar that made it possible for a hacker to impersonate any https site. Until you update your browser.
> But would the hacker need to subvert dns at the same time?
>
> https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/10/20/indian-certification-authority-emudhras-private-keys-compromised-one-of-them-was-the-number-4/5304312
>
> Richard Leir
> Happy Canoeing and Hiking and Biking!
>
> Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for Android.

message navigation