home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: Blacklisting

Does world war affect policies and laws regarding... communications?...

Has anything like a world war been declared?

Would this be required to occur so the public knows before these "shifts"
are (legally) put into place?
system ethics editted
faster than light?

something is being done on rush
because of a current 71me1ne fight


On Sun, Dec 21, 2025, 5:03 p.m. Jean-Francois Messier via linux <
linux [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org> wrote:

> I absolutely agree with you. I see this as a level of control that someone
> or some company has over the industry of email.
>
> Such list should be maintained by a non-profit group of authorities in
> various industries, including members such as domain owners.
>
> JFM
>
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2025 at 5:50 PM Ron via linux <linux [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org>
> wrote:
>
>> Katie via linux wrote on 2025-12-21 13:20:
>>
>> > In my case, the relevant blacklists were: UCEPROTECTL2 UCEPROTECTL3
>> >
>> > I do wonder, at what point is being blacklisted considered a
>> > business- level "attack" or malicious activity against a small or
>> > medium business?
>>
>> Regarding the UCEPROTECT lists, I'd say that time is in the past.
>>
>>
>> According to the links someone posted earlier about those lists, they
>> can almost be used to filter out email providers that rely on them as
>> incompetent, negligent, or just careless.
>>
>> Anyone using an email provider who relies on those should basically be
>> informed of the problem and told to complain to their provider and/or
>> find another one.
>>
>>
>> Harsh, but fair.
>>
>> My 2¢.
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
>> To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
>> To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org
>>
>>

message navigation