home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: interested in any recommendations for new ubuntu 25.04 installation

  • Subject: Re: interested in any recommendations for new ubuntu 25.04 installation
  • From: Bryan Larsen <bryan [ at ] larsen [ dot ] st>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:15:13 -0400
I'd recommend Debian Trixie instead of Ubuntu 25.04.   They froze at
about the same time so have similar versions of software, but Trixie
is a long-term-stable release.

On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:56 PM Robert P. J. Day via linux
<linux [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org> wrote:
>
>
>   good day, all. in my new employment, i have been gifted with a dell
> laptop that i can install from scratch with ubuntu 25.04 any way i
> want, then load it up with all of the dev tools i need. until now,
> i've always just taken the default install, which is to allow the
> installer to allocate pretty much the entire SSD drive to "/", and
> everything goes under there in an ext4 filesystem.
>
>   this new laptop has a 2TB SSD so i'm unlikely to run out of room any
> time soon, but given that much space, and the fact that i'm going to
> be making recommendations on how a few other people will be setting up
> similar laptops, i thought maybe i should put a little more thought
> into it.
>
>   i don't see much point in using LVM since it's unlikely i'll be
> needing to do any restructuring of filesystems, not with that much
> space (and i read in a couple places of others having issues with LVM
> and ubuntu 25.04 desktop), so unless there is a compelling reason,
> i'll pass on LVM.
>
>   is there much value in breaking off into separate filesystems
> perhaps /usr or /home? most of my work (sizable yocto project builds)
> will go under /home, so if there was going to be a huge filesystem,
> that would be the one. also, even on my current 25.04 system, after
> installing most of the dev tools i need, /usr still only uses around
> 12G, so a separate /usr filesystem could probably live with 50G just
> to play it safe.
>
>   with ubuntu, the default filesystem for root is ext4, so i can stick
> with that, but if i want to carve off /usr or /home, is there much
> point using any of the other supported FS types like btrfs, XFS or
> ZFS? i haven't used those, so i'm interested if there are any
> benefits.
>
>   thoughts? i could be lazy and just go with the standard install, but
> i'm willing to hear other suggestions and their benefits.
>
> rday
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
> To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
> To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org
>

To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org