home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: cloud storage with versioning

I personally use pCloud. They advertise a service located in the US, but they also offer at the same price to have the storage in the EU, which is my option. They also offer a fully-supported software that will mount your storage on a Linux client. The mount is using fuse type. It worked flawlessly for me.

JFM

On 2025-04-22 18:02, Nash JC - NCF via linux wrote:
I've been using a VPS that uOttawa lets me have as retired/Adjunct prof. However, it's likely to disappear soon, as IT has been outsourced (given away!) to Micro$oft. I keep getting notices that I should use Outlook for my email. When Micro$oft board chooses to get their carbon and nitrogen for protein from KCN I might do so, but not until.

For the last year or so, I've been exploring how I might use cloud storage for my needs.
Of course, I'm aiming to avoid servers in the USA.

Unfortunately, my biggest storage user is my book writing, for which I currently use Subversion over SSH on the VPS. Essentially I'd like to avoid actually managing a server. The storage needs are in the 60GB zone due to lots of background material.

One possibility is using mounted cloud storage and file:// access for the Subversion.
BUT ...

I discovered that there are glitches with permissions. The idea works nicely with pCloud, but not with Icedrive. Git gives similar issues. I also tried curlftpfs
with the NCF web space, but got problems with file ownership.

I've not tried Stormweb or Proton or ....  And I've not explored what might be
possible in partnering with someone else.

Has anyone in the group tried using cloud storage in such ways? It would be useful
to compare notes.

I might also like to encrypt some stuff -- I do screen prints of some material that has factual tid-bits for my work on historical novels, and don't want to get into arguments over fair dealing. There have been a number of complaints about pCloud closing accounts (and keeping the money!) because they got a hash positive for supposedly copyright material. This also means they are scanning material. Sigh. That would mean local encryption before upload of the sensitive material, which is a pain, but not impossible, as the background material isn't accessed often. In fact, I keep a small svn repo for some personal docs so I can get at them when
travelling.

I've been documenting this investigation, and probably can share the write-up at
some point.

Ideas welcome.

John Nash



To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org


To unsubscribe send a blank message to linux+unsubscribe [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To get help send a blank message to linux+help [ at ] linux-ottawa [ dot ] org
To visit the archives: https://lists.linux-ottawa.org

message navigation