home | list info | list archive | date index | thread index

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] more git Q: lightweight vs annotated tags

  • Subject: Re: [OCLUG-Tech] more git Q: lightweight vs annotated tags
  • From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan [ at ] highrise [ dot ] ca>
  • Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:51:32 -0400
On May 14, 2015 6:18 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday [ at ] crashcourse [ dot ] ca> wrote:
."
>
>   i never knew this, but that makes it even *more* confusing as it
> suggests there should be all 465 tag entries under .git/refs/tags/,
> no? so how do i interpret those lonely three tag names in refs/tags?
>

Sort of like objects,  tags are "packed"  into a single file regularly,  to
avoid lots of files/inodes...