a general question for the masses -- what value do you see in linux books these days? as a regular editor/proofreader/technical reviewer for a couple prominent computer book publishers, i'm occasionally asked to review a *proposal* for a new book, to judge whether it fills a niche, whether it sets itself apart from its competitors, the chances of it being successful, etc, etc. these days, it's tough to decide the probable success of linux books given the wealth of online info only a few clicks away. in particular [slight marketing plug here], given that i want to market red hat admin training in the new year, i'm getting most of my info from red hat's online documentation here, which is really high-quality: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/ i just can't see buying a red hat admin book anymore, regardless of how well it's written, unless it has a novel approach of some kind. if people on this list still buy books, how do you judge whether something's worth purchasing? what do you look for? at a minimum, it seems to me that a book needs to have the following properties: * available in e-form * home page with: * downloadable source code and examples * constantly updated list of errata i'm sure there's more but that seems like a bare minimum these days. thoughts? rday